<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hulu to begin charging in 2010 says exec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2009/10/22/hulu-to-begin-charging-in-2010-says-exec/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/22/hulu-to-begin-charging-in-2010-says-exec/</link>
	<description>Top Technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Flying Basghetti Monster</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/22/hulu-to-begin-charging-in-2010-says-exec/comment-page-1/#comment-226934</link>
		<dc:creator>The Flying Basghetti Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=21031#comment-226934</guid>
		<description>Whatever. Before we start spouting about the free content apocalypse, has anyone who uses Hulu noticed that they have COMMERCIALS supporting all of their content? You&#039;d have to be incredibly naive to believe that a company as smart as Hulu would walk away on the very model that has made them so successful. But to believe that Hulu might offer users the option to view content commercial free at a small subscription based cost... is that so absurd?  Free content is not going away, and existing TV and cable models will not survive the 21st century - despite what a rich, jealous old coot like Chase Carey might want to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever. Before we start spouting about the free content apocalypse, has anyone who uses Hulu noticed that they have COMMERCIALS supporting all of their content? You&#8217;d have to be incredibly naive to believe that a company as smart as Hulu would walk away on the very model that has made them so successful. But to believe that Hulu might offer users the option to view content commercial free at a small subscription based cost&#8230; is that so absurd?  Free content is not going away, and existing TV and cable models will not survive the 21st century &#8211; despite what a rich, jealous old coot like Chase Carey might want to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/22/hulu-to-begin-charging-in-2010-says-exec/comment-page-1/#comment-221549</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=21031#comment-221549</guid>
		<description>I think this is a very bad idea, and they should come up with a way to keep it free and increase revenue.  More advertising or another method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a very bad idea, and they should come up with a way to keep it free and increase revenue.  More advertising or another method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/22/hulu-to-begin-charging-in-2010-says-exec/comment-page-1/#comment-221478</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=21031#comment-221478</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s really not that much on Hulu that makes it worth paying for.  Pay per website is a bad idea.  I read Rupert Murdoch is going to do that with his websites.  Who is going to pay their monthly internet fees and want to pay to view each website and also get advertising shoved down their throat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s really not that much on Hulu that makes it worth paying for.  Pay per website is a bad idea.  I read Rupert Murdoch is going to do that with his websites.  Who is going to pay their monthly internet fees and want to pay to view each website and also get advertising shoved down their throat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris R</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/22/hulu-to-begin-charging-in-2010-says-exec/comment-page-1/#comment-221467</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 22:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=21031#comment-221467</guid>
		<description>How much TV do we really need? The commercial they had about turning our brains to goo had an element of truth in it.

I&#039;ve been there a few times... I won&#039;t really miss it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much TV do we really need? The commercial they had about turning our brains to goo had an element of truth in it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been there a few times&#8230; I won&#8217;t really miss it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymo</title>
		<link>http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:/2009/10/22/hulu-to-begin-charging-in-2010-says-exec/comment-page-1/#comment-221201</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.blorge.com/?p=21031#comment-221201</guid>
		<description>The beginning of the end for Hulu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beginning of the end for Hulu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

