Comments on: AT&T’s weak 3G coverage map? There’s a lawsuit for that

By: pat

pat — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:46:35 +0000

well they should lose the lawsuit because the two maps being compared were “3G” not 2G of both providers

By: JohnJ

JohnJ — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:31:44 +0000

Carmel, as long as people pay, AT&T has no incentive to improve their network.

By: davejeyes

davejeyes — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:11:02 +0000

@aquaadverse

The battery life issues really started when Apple released the push updates feature. Until then, the battery was just fine.

By: Carmel Vella

Carmel Vella — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:36:22 +0000

“WEAK”, how about almost non existent. AT&T has the audacity to keep removing $60 per month from my bank account and in return I get NO service at all. I ahve tried their external modem for my laptop for over a year in many places with almost no signal available. And I call it it outright theft, but no lawyers seem interested. I wonder why.
Are they paying off a lawyer organization somewhere? Even my Blackberry Bold is apiece of crap as far as their service is concerned.

By: aquaadverse

aquaadverse — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:11:31 +0000

Is it any wonder 3G wasn’t a priority for the first iPhone with that nonsense about it burning up battery juice too fast?

By: DavidB

DavidB — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:41:45 +0000

Seriously. This is pure sour grapes from ATT at having been publicly called out for their poor coverage area. I suspect the lawsuit would get tossed as Verizon clearly labels the map “3G”, and it’s perfectly accurate.

From my BlackBerry Storm…