Top 40 best free legal movies you can download right now
While you constantly hear about how downloading movies is illegal, there are numerous free legal movies you can download. Sure we aren’t talking about the latest summer blockbusters here, but there are some great films out there on the Internet that can be had for free.
The Internet Archive works to bring together anything and everything that resides in the public domain, and that includes movies. We’ve gathered together 40 of the best ones that will keep you entertained for hours on end, all without costing you a dime outside of using some of your bandwidth. Enjoy!
You may also be interested in David Cassel’s compilation of the top 40 best free comedy movies you can watch right now compiled in 2011.
Drama
A Star Is Born: This 1937 version of a story of a rising star in Hollywood was remade twice, once in 1954 with Judy Garland and again in 1976 with Barbara Streisand.
Bronenosets Potyomkin (Battleship Potemkin): A major turning point in the production of silent movies that took the camera out of being something that didn’t move to actually being involved in the story.
Captain Kidd: Charles Laughton and John Carradine star in this film of suspense on the high seas from 1945.
Child Bride: A controversial film from 1938 about a schoolteacher trying to end the practice of older men taking child brides in the Ozark mountains.
Cyrano De Bergerac: This 1950 adaptation of the story is widely regarded as the best version by many people.
Farwell to Arms: Based on the novel by Ernest Hemingway, this 1932 film stars Gary Cooper and Helen Hayes.
Great Guy: James Cagney stars in this 1936 film about one mans efforts to clean up corruption in the Weights And Measures Department.
Iron Mask: A 1952 re-release of the 1929 silent film with added narration by Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. as his father had starred in the movie.
Last of the Mohicans: A 1920 silent film adaptation of the novel. Keep an eye out for Boris Karloff in his first role as an uncredited Native American.
Mambo: A 1954 film about the rising star of a female dancer who’s past comes back to haunt her when she returns to her home city of Venice.
Meet John Doe: A Frank Capra film starring Gary Cooper and Barbara Stanwyck about a journalist who makes up a story about a John Doe, and then sees the story take on a life of its own, even launching a political movement.
Shame: Produced by Roger Corman and starring a pre-Star Trek William Shatner, this film tells the story of a man sent into a southern town to stir up race riots. Roger Corman claims this is the only film of the over 300 he’s produced to lose money.
The Boy in the Plastic Bubble: A 1976 television movie based on the real life story of a boy who could not come into contact with unfiltered air, causing him to live his life in a bubble. It was notable for starring John Travolta and Robert Reed, best known as Mike Brady on The Brady Bunch. For some odd reason this film became a pop culture phenomenon, being referenced many times on That 70′s Show, spawning the term “in the bubble” in politics and so on.
The Contender: A 1944 version of the story of a prizefighter that loses sight of what is most important in his life. Stars Buster Crabbe, best known for his role as Tarzan.
The Stranger: Starring Edward G. Robinson and Orson Welles, this 1946 film tells the story of a Nazi who hides in the United States after the war and is hunted by a member of the Allied War Crimes Commission.
The Time of Your Life: A 1948 adaptation of William Saroyan’s award-winning play, this version starred James Cagney.
Family
Beyond Tomorrow: A Christmas classic about three ghosts that attempt to help two young lovers that they knew in life to finally get together.
Little Lord Fauntleroy: A 1936 film adaptation of the classic 19th century novel of the same name. Great movie with an A-list cast of the day and age.
Rescue from Gilligan’s Island: The first of three TV films that followed the original series. Yes, the castaways do indeed get off the island. This film was also notable for Tina Louise, the original Ginger, not returning for the production, but the rest of the original cast returned.
Santa Claus Conquers the Martians: A 1964 film that probably would have been forgotten if it wasn’t for Mystery Science Theater 3000 making fun of it. Yes, it involves Santa Claus and Martians … and it just gets weirder from there.
Scrooge: The 1935 version of the classic A Christmas Carol from Carles Dickens starring Seymour Hicks.
Mystery/Thriller
The 39 Steps: A 1935 film directed by Alfred Hitchcock. It is loosely based on the novel The Thirty-nine Steps by John Buchan.
Blackmail: Directed by Alfred Hitchcock in 1929, not only was this the first film he directed with sound, but it was the first British “talkie”. It was also released as a silent film, so the talking is a bit sparse.
Dick Tracy: This is the original 15 chapter film serial combined into one film which runs over four and a half hours.
Dick Tracy Detective: Based on the Dick Tracy comic strip, this 1945 film was the first full-length feature film adaptation of the character as opposed to the numerous serials that had been down up to this point. Tracy must solve a series of murders that appear to have no connection.
Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome: Another Dick Tracy film from 1947, this one is notable for starring Boris Karloff as Gruesome. A gang of bank robbers discover a nerve gas that will freeze people in place.
Five Minutes To Live: A movie about bank robbers that is most notable for starring Vic Tayback (Mel on the TV series Alice), Johnny Cash and a six-year-old Ron Howard that is credited as “Ronnie Howard”.
Murder!: A 1930 film by Alfred Hitchcock based on the novel Enter Sir John by Clemence Dane and Helen Simpson. It revolves around a murder in an acting troupe and the member who is found standing over the body suffering from amnesia.
The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog: A 1927 silent film by Alfred Hitchcock about a landlady who suspects her lodger is a murder killing women around London.
The Phantom of the Opera: A 1925 film adaptation of the novel by Gaston Leroux, this silent film version stars the infamous Lon Chaney as the Phantom.
Sci-Fi/Horror
Hercules Against the Moon Men: Poor Hercules, he has had more bad movies made about him than probably any other mythical character. This one ended up on Mystery Science Theater 3000 if that’s any indication of how bad it was.
House on Haunted Hill: The 1959 version of the story of a man who invites people into his home full of ghosts to spend the night, and if they make it, they will earn money.
Night of the Living Dead: The first of the “Living Dead” films by George A. Romero. Even though it was made in 1968, it fell into the public domain immediately because the copyright notice was inadvertently left off the finished film.
Plan 9 from Outer Space: Considered by many to be one of the worst films ever made, Ed Wood’s “classic” has to be seen to be believed.
Rocketship X-M: A 1950′s sci-fi “classic” starring Lloyd Bridges about a spaceship that misses the target of landing on the moon and somehow ends up on Mars where it discovers an ancient city.
The Brain That Wouldn’t Die: A 1962 film that is probably best remembered for being mocked on Mystery Science Theater 3000 more than its own merits.
The Brother from Another Planet: A cult classic film that was released in 1984, but sadly another example of a copyright notice being left off the print, so it immediately fell into the public domain. A mute alien lands in Harlem and is chased by intergalactic bounty hunters.
The Last Man on Earth: Starring Vincent Price, this was the first film adaptation of the novel I Am Legend by Richard Matheson. This version was made in 1964, and then followed by The Omega Man in 1971 and I Am Legend in 2007.
The Phantom Planet: A 1961 film that also has the dubious honor of being remembered mostly for having been on Mystery Science Theater 3000. A rocketship ends up on a planet full of mini-people, and the astronauts get shrunk down to their size … it just gets stranger from there.
White Zombie: A 1932 horror film starring the infamous Bela Lugosi about a man who turns to a witch doctor to win the love of a young woman, but she instead gets turned into a zombie. This was the film that inspired the name of the band White Zombie.
Related Posts:
August 12th, 2010
The link for “Beyond Tomorrow” is broken, should be http://www.archive.org/details/Beyond_Tomorrow
Great list! =)
August 12th, 2010
Link fixed, thanks for the catch!
August 12th, 2010
Well, Internet Archive has no copyright-checking department, it is riff with Copyright material. Old films in particular are a real problem – all it takes is one person to say “XYZ film is in the public domain” and upload it to an ad-laden page somewhere, where everyone in the world downloads it thinking it actually is in the PD (it’s not), and pretty soon the rights holder has to play wack-a-mole all over the world trying to remove it from sites like Internet Archive where it gets replicated. Of course many of these films are no longer profitable and so the rights holder doesn’t bother protecting their property.
Look, anything published after 1923 in the USA is Copyright, unless some certain conditions apply. Don’t you find it weird that some of these films are public domain? In fact probably most of them are NOT public domain, except in the Internet fantasy world known as “don’t ask, I want my free movies”.
August 13th, 2010
What, no D.O.A.?
http://www.archive.org/details/doa_1949
August 21st, 2010
@Silent Lamb, “probably most of them are NOT public domain”.
Err… yes they are. Do your research.
Stop trolling.
August 30th, 2010
All it takes for something to fall into the public domain is for the copyright holder to not renew the copyright. Corporations routinely renew everything, but if the copyright is held by a private owner or a defunct company, it might easily fall into the public doman. Many of these movies were circulating around for years before the internet on VHS tapes.
January 12th, 2011
Silent Lamb is an idiot. Nobody owns these movies anymore. Anyone can download, watch, and use them. Companies make budget DVD’s and sell them for $1 at dollar stores. When a right holder doesn’t renew their stuff it goes PD. You need to do some research…
January 14th, 2011
Actually copyright laws differ in every country. In the USA you have to apply for a copyright but in the UK copyright is automatically granted normally for 70 years after the death of the creator. Quoting from the copyright office website:
Films
70 years from the end of the calendar year in which the last principal director, author or composer dies.
If the work is of unknown authorship: 70 years from end of the calendar year of creation, or if made available to the public in that time, 70 years from the end of the year the film was first made available.
Therefore like Project Gutenberg says:
“Our ebooks are free in the United States because their copyright has expired. They may not be free of copyright in other countries. Readers outside of the United States must check the copyright laws of their countries before downloading or redistributing our ebooks.”
January 19th, 2011
As the post says, nothing after circa 1923 is in the public domain. As for those who falsely claim otherwise, and say, “Do your research”: instead of doing “research” in reading self-justifying criminal rationales, go to the Library of Congress website and read the Copyright Act, beginning with the definitions, such as “fair use”.
And, no: “failure” to include a copyright notice does not mean the work is therefore in the public domain; the provision of law on that point says it is advisable to include such notice, but it is not essential. It is especially not essential when the work was made before that provision of law.
Nor is it necessary to renew copyright before the passage of a stipulated period of time. That doesn’t coincidentlly coincide with your desire to steal a film.
Nor does the fact that “companies” issue these films on DVD and sell them for $1.00 prove anything, as they are BOOTLEGS, as you well know.
So stop the lying — the misrepresentations of the law — behind pseudonymns, in order to justify stealing.
January 19th, 2011
Right, anything not renewed older than 1923 falls into public domain. And yes, archive holds plenty of footage that is not in public domain.
But the accusation that people are stealing these films is ridiculous, they exist for entertainment and historical purposes, to which I’m absolutely sure their creators would be perfectly happy that their works of art were being circulated.
We don’t care about your copywrite laws, because the love of the moving picture has nothing to do with money.
And as for fair use, this pretty much means anything goes once you start chopping things up.
January 21st, 2011
JNagarya: is Lamb under another name. You are an idiot by any name. Night of the Living Dead for example, made in 1968, is in the public domain whether you like it or not. So for you to say any movie isn’t makes you a buffoon. I really didn’t think it was possible NOT to know this. Amazing, simply amazing, always the idiots who scream the loudest.
January 21st, 2011
And we will take Night of the Living Dead and blow into a thousand transcendental fragments, leaving the living to feast on the brains of the deceased.
January 21st, 2011
I quote this from imdb, regarding Night of the Living Dead:
‘At the time of the film’s release, any work that did not include a copyright notice was assumed to be public domain. Since the film makers forgot to include this notice, the film slipped into the public domain. In was not until 1 March 1989 that a copyright notice was no longer required.’
We might have to study each case individually, it seems, especially since laws about copyright have kept changing, as it seems.
January 24th, 2011
Check Library of Congress. ANY copyrighted material may be released into public domain by the current copyright holder.
January 25th, 2011
“We don’t care about your copywrite laws, because the love of the moving picture has nothing to do with money.”
Funny, my landlord doesn’t accept rent in the form of “love of the moving picture.”
“And as for fair use, this pretty much means anything goes once you start chopping things up.”
And here’s some legal advice that’s about as good as you’d expect advice from someone who can’t spell “copyright” to be.
January 27th, 2011
Under current US law, works are automatically copyrighted and don’t have to be renewed, but this wasn’t always the case. Plenty of films are public domain because the rights holder went under (most of them) or because they were never copyrighted in the first place (Night of the Living Dead, by accident in this case). While I’m sure some non-PD stuff sneaks onto archive.org, this isn’t just Internet hooligans distributing this stuff. There are plenty of DVD companies that specialize in making cheap copies of PD movies and selling them for a couple dollars (Arrow Video and Madacy, for instance). If there were a copyright, the holder would have someone to sue for damages, not just run around play Internet whack-a-mole. Archive.org does remove things if people complain that it’s not PD. For instance, M is no longer available.
January 29th, 2011
i love these movies and love this site
January 30th, 2011
Under:
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
You are here:1988 c. 48Part IChapter IDuration of copyrightSection 12
(6)Where the country of origin of the work is not an EEA state and the author of the work is not a national of an EEA state, the duration of copyright is that to which the work is entitled in the country of origin, provided that does not exceed the period which would apply under subsections (2) to (5)..
That is for the UK. So films would normally get life & 70 years for US films. But as the work is not entitled to anything currently and it is not an EEA state, the work is in the public domain in the UK too.
January 30th, 2011
Since DRM was initiated, the copyright laws of the US has been extended to 99 years and can be renewed for $1.00. Many old movie that were in the public domain reverted back to being under copyright.
It is nice for Hollywood to have the politicians in their pockets….
January 31st, 2011
Hi. Useful list! Is it OK to re-use the list and descriptions elsewhere, eg. in databases? I’m working on ways to get better navigation of archive.org and have been collecting incoming links eg. from wikipedia as a way of providing more info. Would you consider contributing these (or at least the link selection if not your descriptions) under CCZero? http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CC0
February 1st, 2011
Silent lamb/nagarya, your behavior brings to mind two quotes that seem to be apropos:
“Thou doth protest too much” (specifically your pseudonym hypocrisy) &
“At times it is best to keep one’s mouth shut and be thought a fool, then to open it and remove all doubt!”
As stated above: “STOP TROLLING!”
You sir, are little more than a two bit Napoleon!
Peace and Blessings from Seattle! (Yeah, you too Nappy!!)
February 2nd, 2011
Link to Scrooge (1935) broke, thanks.
February 6th, 2011
Nice List, but you forget so many very good Movies.
For example Metropolis, Gold-Rush, The General, ….
Good Movies (PD and free)you find unter: http://www.kinofilme-online.com
February 8th, 2011
Sarışın Esmer Videoları
February 15th, 2011
Definitely recommend ‘Mambo’…not the best acting but ahead of its time AND you have the wonderful Katherine Dunham. Also, ‘The Brother from Another Planet’ which I saw in its original theater release and it well deserves its cult status. Amazing film! ‘House on Haunted Hill’…it’s VINCENT PRICE…what’s not to love? And ‘A Star is Born’…the best release with Judy Garland’s version coming in at a close second! Enjoy!
February 18th, 2011
Bless you for posting, excellent read, are you likely to be performing any kind of follow up about the idea.
February 19th, 2011
these movies suck. fucking weirdos need girlfriends man, seriously.
February 20th, 2011
The copyright FUD posters sound like MPAA shills trying to make people frightened of sharing such content. If you want to avoid people seeing you as a troll, do some bloody research and cite references here as to what films on this list should not be freely distributed! Put up or shut up.
February 20th, 2011
I seriously doubt any of use viewing these films are making a dime and that would seem to be the key to copyright infringment as is stated in the following copyright disclaimer. I believe most of us view these film on an educational basis for discussion of cinema history and techniques. I love making music videos just for fun and learn so much from watching these beautiful old films. Thanks to everyone for sharing these classic works.
“Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.”
Silent Lamb you poor soul, just…. welll… be silent and sit down, take a breath and watch a classic flick. You might just learn something creative to add to the discussion of these works. Which the above copyright disclaimer encourages each of us to do.
February 20th, 2011
Whoops, almost forgot LOL, there is so much for the hobbist video maker to learn from the flick Night of the Living Dead. What a brilliant low budget flick.
February 23rd, 2011
I was disappointed to see that two movies were not included in this list: “Beat The Devil” and “Vessel Of Wrath.”
February 27th, 2011
The movies mentioned (Public domain or not) are an excellent collection. By viewing them, doing a little web research, one could actually sound intelligent when discussing cinema.
By the way – the best way to defang trolls (suspected or confirmed) is to simply ignore them.
To engage them lets the drag you down to their level, where they beat you with experience.
Note that Hitchcock appears on the list with Lodger and 39 steps. Many folks don’t know that his first films were silents. His body of work is a must view –
however you get them.
March 2nd, 2011
all these movies are outdated stuff, come on… make this interesting people!
March 3rd, 2011
these movies are all listed on the Internet Archive and HAVE been researched for standing Copyrights for every single movie in the list provided here at least 90 days of research in to owner and Copyright holder was done and NONE was found also they notify the Federal Copyright Office in Washington DC to confirm there findings and clear it with there lawyers they are aided by the library of congress in determining there facts prior to posting any film book photo or information on there site
March 3rd, 2011
Myself and a bunch of other misfits from all across the world recently recorded an original soundtrack to The Battleship Potemkin. As part of the process we also cleaned up the print a bit and it can be viewed or downloaded from here > http://www.archive.org/details/ApskaftPresentsTheBattleshipPotemkin
March 7th, 2011
I hope you like also this one!
http://www.torno-subito.com
It is free movie in HD published by the end of 2008!
I found it exciting!
March 13th, 2011
My daughter Sue emailed the list. Brought back fond memories of the movies I enjoyed in the mid 20s and 30s. I’m pushing 96 years now and looking forward to
watching some again. Thanks very, David
March 15th, 2011
I think Buster Crabbe was more well known for FLASH GORDON not Tarzan.
March 16th, 2011
I just watched “The Stranger” recently. It was on television, forget which channel. Maybe Turner Classic Movies, as I receive that channel.
IN any regard, highly recommended! Very good movie.
Thanks for this list, there are many on here that I will be watching. In my opinion, the older movies, and I mean right thru to the 1990s, are the best movies. The newest movies, save for a few, are mostly trash! Again, just my opinion, no flame war is necessary.
March 16th, 2011
Beautiful article, truly a treat, wish you feel all fuzzy inside Sean P. Aune, thank you.
March 17th, 2011
Watching these old films is like studying art history. Why were the old masters so good at what they did at the time. You can’t compare modern times to the past.Theres a progression of learning involved. In all forms of art this is true and it takes some insite to understand this.Some people would accept a Van Gogh painting because its worth money not because its a master piece. Even though thier totally in the dark as to why. By the way are the old trailers also in the PD?
March 18th, 2011
Should anyone actually give a sheet about the copyright issue? Only people who try to sell it who don’t own it. Let’s not get our breeches in such a bindle.
I wish the Internet Archive had Colossus: The Forbin Project.
March 19th, 2011
Would any of you willingly work for your employer or customers for free, other than voluntary philanthropic endeavors such as donations to a cause of your choosing ?
Obviously, the answer would be no.
Anyone elses intellectual property is no different that you and your work you demand payment for. Your time versus adequate legal and rightful compensation. Does not matter if you make widgets, build houses or furniture, or service someone with your time.
This is what I never understood about the irrational attempts at justifying blatant theft that ocurrs with intellectual property infringement.
When someone creates an intellectual work, it is their property. Period. If they wish to allow others free access and/or distribution rights, hey, that’s fine and dandy, however anything less than that should be criminal theft – forever. It’s theirs. They created it jsut like you created what you made and invested your time.
As an independent software developer, I live this situation daily. As income decreases, your hard work is stolen and distributed at a higher rate, ending up on the torrent sites and black market sites for free or at greatly reduced rates (pirated and bootlegged), usually at sites and services hosted in countries where the Intellecual Property laws and treaties are non-existent or still in the dark ages.
Sure we all like free stuff, but unless you want to be stolen from, think twice before stealing from others.
Personally, I believe there should be a world-wide law giving copyrights automatically and forever.
March 22nd, 2011
has anyone bothered to make sure that all these “quotes” are not being copy and pasted from a protected website? It is like trying to make a Native American understand the concept of land ownership. I have the ability to hold it in my hand but its not mine the land is completely out of grasp.
March 24th, 2011
With all of the people who use this site we should have at least one lawyer, schooled in English Common Law, that could interpret copyright law and provide a valid legal opinion for english-speaking countries. Until now this thread has been nothing but meaingless speculation.
March 29th, 2011
Why isn’t “Charade” on the list?
that’s a great film
http://www.archive.org/details/charade1963
and lets just drop all the hoopla with copyright
March 30th, 2011
Nice list.
thanks for the scifi/horror movies, I watched only one.
April 2nd, 2011
Is this for real? Can I really use these movies in a short film that I’m making? I don’t have to pay anyone?
April 10th, 2011
Marcus, you can want eternal copyright all you want, but that doesn’t make it real. I personally find the concept a bit appalling; we the people would be paying a fortune in royalties to teach our kids Shakespeare and Twain, money that would probably be going to some company not producing anything but money for its shareholders. It would be a terrible expensive loss to society. Already we’ve lost films permanently because those groups that could and would restore them couldn’t find the copyright holder, or couldn’t reach an agreement with the copyright holder.
Sam: Yes, these movies are believed to be in the public domain in the US. As always, you should double check yourself, and things may vary abroad; I suspect the Hitchcock and Hercules, at the least, are still copyrighted in the EU.
April 15th, 2011
“As the post says, nothing after circa 1923 is in the public domain.”
Um…so that’s why at one time “It’s A Wonderful Life” (1946) was played on television by everyone and anyone and released on DVD multiple times….until some company went to court and reclaimed it as theirs (which I still don’t understand how THAT’s legal)?
And that’s why Fritz Lang’s “Metropolis” (1927) can be released or shown by anyone (not the reconstructed version with the Buenos Aries footage – Kino has the copyright to that)?
Dear God, how can there be so many brain dead people out there alive and walking around?
April 24th, 2011
Blackmail and Brother From Another Planet look to have been removed. Blackmail is claimed by Canal+, although the fact it’s over 70 years old is the argument against. Brother I don’t know about, although apparently all films made after 1976 had retrospective copyright added to them.
April 24th, 2011
PD movies can be easily re-copyrighted. If I was to find an old version of a 1925 classic currently found in PD and was to upgrade it to digital video or make any change at all, say add a new soundtrack, then that new version now becomes mine and is legally re-copyrighted to me the day I release it.
So, that’s why some people can claim copyright on an old movie. Make any change and it’s now yours.
Many of the companies are doing exactly that, putting a menu system onto a DVD around the movie and these are all newly copyrighted. It means you can’t go the dollar shop & simply copy & sell their disk legally but you can go to archive.org, download the movie, put your own menu system and then legally have copyright to your own version.
April 26th, 2011
I’m glad Shame’s available. Shatner seemed pretty proud of it, if I remember rightly from his book.
April 28th, 2011
The case of Frank Capra should be mentioned,he forgot to contact his lawyers to renew the copyright of,It’s a Wonderful Life,so it fell into public domain,costing Capra millions,So, he borrowed money,colorized it,and because he owned the original copyright was allowed to copyright the colorized version.The black and white version remains in public domain,that’s why TV people usually show the b&w version.
May 7th, 2011
Dear All,
concerning “It’a Wonderful Life”, there was an underlying copyright for the book or screenplay that was used to make the movie. The writer or his family
reclaimed their copyright.
May 12th, 2011
History of US Copyrights
Copyright Act of 1790 – established U.S. copyright with term of 14 years with 14-year renewal
Copyright Act of 1831 – extended the term to 28 years with 14-year renewal
Copyright Act of 1909 – extended term to 28 years with 28-year renewal
Universal Copyright Convention – ratified by the U.S. in 1954, and again in 1971, this treaty was developed by UNESCO as an alternative to the Berne Convention
Copyright Act of 1976 – extended term to either 75 years or life of author plus 50 years; extended federal copyright to unpublished works; preempted state copyright laws; codified much copyright doctrine that had originated in case law
Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 – established copyrights of U.S. works in Berne Convention countries
Copyright Renewal Act of 1992 – removed the requirement for renewal
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) of 1994 – restored U.S. copyright for certain foreign works
Copyright Term Extension Act of 1998 – extended terms to 95/120 years or life plus 70 years
Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 – criminalized some cases of copyright infringement
Just tell me again who is stealing from whom?
May 16th, 2011
The US avoided signing the Berne Convention for 102 years, mainly because the rest of the world retains ‘moral rights’ in copyright (think ‘colorizing’ B&W films! Would be a violation (unless permitted) of the original production’s print), and the ‘formalities’, such as registration.
Most of the posters here seem to know about 1/3rd of the situation with copyright.
For any work, whether it is PD or not, should be readily available with due diligence.
One of the prime sources for US promotion of extended periods of protection, comes from Disney… they don’t want to allow Mickey Mouse and all their animations to go into the public domain. Thank you, Mickey…
May 20th, 2011
Brother from another planet is not a public domain movie. It is own by MGM. I am certain that John Sayles would not have over looked this issue.
May 21st, 2011
of course you have to copy them right, if you did’nt then that would be……wait for it………copywrong
May 23rd, 2011
It’s a wonderful life owes it’s success to not being copyrighted. It was a total flop when released, but then when it went out of copyright, TV stations just started showing it to fill in gaps in schedules cos it was free, and so it gained a following. So it didn’t cost Frank Capra million, cos if he renewed the copyright, the ststions would not have shown the film and it would have been forgotten.
June 3rd, 2011
public domain n. 1) in copyright law, the right of anyone to use literature, music or other previously copyrighted materials, after the copyright period has expired. Although the copyright laws have changed several times, a rule of thumb would be that the last possible date for copyright protection would be 50 years after the death of the author. Thus, the works of William Shakespeare, Mark Twain, Jack London, and other classic writers are in the public domain and may be published by anyone without payment of a royalty.
June 3rd, 2011
The data below will let you know when you can safely use a piece of art or music without permission because it is now in public domain after copyright protection expiration, or how long the copyright protection will last.
* Published before 1923 – now in public domain
* Published from 1923 to 1963 – When published with a copyright notice © or “Copyright [dates] by [author/owner]” – copyright protection lasts 28 years and could be renewed for an additional 67 years for a total of 95 years. If not renewed, now in public domain.
* Published from 1923 to 1963 – When published with no notice – now in public domain
* Published from 1964 to 1977 – When published with notice – copyright protection lasts 28 years for first term; automatic extension of 67 years for second term for a total of 95 years.
* Created before 1/1/1978 but not published – copyright notice is irrelevant – copyright protection lasts for the life of author and 70 years or 12/31/2002, whichever is greater
* Created before 1/1/1978 and published between 1/1/1978 and 12/31/2002 – notice is irrelevant – copyright protecion lasts the life of author and 70 years or 12/31/2047, whichever is greater
* Created 1/1/1978 or after – When work is fixed in tangible medium of expression – notice is irrelevant – copyright protecion lasts for the life of author and 70 years based on the the longest living author if jointly created or if work of corporate authorship, works for hire, or anonymous and pseudonymous works, the shorter of 95 years from publication, or 120 years from creation.
June 3rd, 2011
to hell with hollywood and to hell with record companies. there has been no end of people made rich by fans pooring billions upon trillions of dollars into their industry and what do the fans get? for instance hasn’t all the executives made enough fucking profit off elvis and the original star wars. we made them movies because of all the money we paid for them. what kind of laws can the blue collar man make to keep on making profits on something .I meanit makes no legal sense but it makes fair sense that when those greedy execs make enough millions of dollars to go around we should be able to say this stuff falls under fan domain. we dang well bought the rights to enjoy that art. let them companies all get jipped and go out of buisness we have enough art to last the living world forever. we dont need those companies anymore they need to stop ripping off the poor and middle class.
i mean if we gave them stuff and they didnt need us anymore. theyd sure as corporate law rip us off too. who the hell can whine “oh poor record company moguls their not making 900% profit. also dont insult my typing and spelling i’m smart in other ways
June 3rd, 2011
I cant believe any man would whine about licensed art being stolen. have you heard about the entertainment industrys standard of living. where the hell does somebody get off thinking thats fair. those peckers are only rich because of their fans money. everytime we buy a ticket in their pyramid scheme they make another million damn dollars. and we wind up going back home poorer and with only memories. but they can buy a broadcasting station and do it all over again in a repetative cycle forever. oh but they lost alot of money cause everybodies downloading. yeah then they go home poorer and with only memories too. you know I dont think what I’m saying makes any legal sense whatsoever. but you know when you only obey legal and monetary principals you might ignore moral and ethical principals and think im ridiculous. well im not ridiculous im a low income blue collar man who just cant do like the beatles. so being poor I believe in the value of being good and fair and sharing for free some of the crap I do. im not hell bent on suing college kids who have enough on their plates for copyright infringement because im plenty rich but my profit margin just aint up to par. and God FORBID SOMEBODY GOT A TWENTY DOLLAR DREAM COME TRUE FOR FREE. I bET SOME OF YOU REALLY HOPE THAT WALL STREET AND BANKERS HAVE A GOOD YEAR AND MAKE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN PROFIT OFF THE WORKING CLASS BECAUSE THE LAW SAYS THEY CAN. TO YOU PEOPLE WHO i DONT UNDERSTAND BUT WHO ARE SO IN THE KNOW ABOUT PUBLIC DOMAIN LAWS ITS ALL ABOUT SCREWIN A DUDE OVER SO THAT dONALD TRUMP CAN SPEND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON ANOTHER GOLF COURSE IN SCOTLAND. BOY WOULDNT IT BE A TRAGEDY IF THE ROCKEFELLERS AND GEORGE LUCAS ONLY BROKE EVEN FOR ONCE YOU TWISTED CORRUPT BANKERS AND CRY BABIES ABOUT MICHAEL JACKSONS HEIRS ROYALTIES. AND I DONT GIVE A DAMN ABOUT MU CRAPPY TYPING IM SMART IN OYHERWAYS LOL
June 5th, 2011
After that confusing diatribe (is max “poor” or “plenty rich”?), I need to jump in.
I decided to dig through all these comments looking for some hidden gems available at The Internet Archive. Instead, I find too much discussion of copyrights, etc.
I like to think that max may be on the right track above. Just before he found the “Caps Lock” key, max states, “I believe in the value of being good and sharing for free some of the crap I do.”
Although, by NO means, do I view his movies as “crap”, my mind went to Roger Corman. I am not aware of any details, but I understand that Mr. Corman did not renew the copyrights on many of his movies. That allowed me to pick up ten of his movies in a (nice) set for less than a dollar each. To my understanding, if Mr. Corman wanted to take these movies out of “public domain”, he probably could. But, as far as I know, he has not.
So, if I wanted to make a few bucks on copies of “Dementia 13″ (my personal favorite), I probably could. Would that bother Mr. Corman? I do not know. Would that change the fact that it is HIS movie? No, not at all. I praise Roger Corman for making so many movies and letting some slip into “public domain”.
Finally, thank you, Sean, for providing this list.
June 12th, 2011
I really wish people would’ve kept their big mouths shut about all the copyright crap. I really wanted to see Hitchcock’s Murder! as it just so happens the plot matches a book I’ve been writing (and almost have finished–so I swear I’m not stealing the idea). Still, with the similarity, I thought it would be interesting. That makes the second one I’ve clicked on that has been pulled. All you copyright criers suck! For movies this old, I don’t feel bad watching them on a site like this. Can’t imagine there’s a bunch of kids clamoring to watch a 1930′s movie like me. For new movies, new books, etc., fine, you’ve got a point. Movie stars and the studios make tons of cash. But I hear it is different for small time players in the movie biz. I know it is a different story for writers–even those who hit the NY times best seller list are far from rich by and large–a few Steven Kings, Dean Koontz, etc. notwithstanding. But a 1930′s Hitchcock film–I don’t see the harm. I don’t see the harm at all!
June 21st, 2011
Whether the films are public domain or not… you don’t HAVE TO FOLLOW THE LAW. WAKE UP. People break laws everyday because they don’t agree with them.
Don’t fear the government. That is what gives it power.
Peace and love and good flicks
I’m going to watch Five Minutes To Live
July 3rd, 2011
I hope no one spoils The Internet Archive by taking this copyright issue further, it is a treasure trove of information and one I have been using for years. I have a keen interest in old movies and know of no other site that has such a large portfolio of films that allows me to study the thing I love.
In saying that I do find some of the above comments unreasonable, some seem to think the movie makers of today should make films and charge nothing for their viewing. This is a preposterous proposition, how are the film companies supposed to get the money to enable them to produce the films we love if they are not getting income to invest.
No the real reason for these tight individuals to say they want to get things for free but don’t want to pay, is they don’t like to part with their money. In my opinion they are no better than thieves and I have no time for them and their illegal pirating of contemporary movies off the net.
They are the type that will kill the industry if they continue to infringe the copyright laws, I hope the people who do it are tracked down and prosecuted.
July 8th, 2011
You talk of copy right, what about ownership? If you purchase something, it means you own it. If you own it, that means you can move it, modify it, give it away or what ever you want. So if you purchase, say a movie, you own it. Period. You can do what ever you want with it. If this is not true, then we would only pay a small “rental” fee at wal-mart or where ever we buyt movies. Ownership overrides copyright.
July 23rd, 2011
This is awesome!!! I don’t know jack about copyright law and I don’t care-this is amazing. Thank you and good night!!!
July 24th, 2011
Copyright law is a dinosaur looking for a meteor.
Kill it with bittorrent!
July 26th, 2011
came accross this by accident. WOW, people will fight over anything! If there is a copyright infringement on this site, I bet if you emailed they would check into it and take it off. Problem solved. Now all you people who are so passionate about the law, why don’t you go out and save someone’s life today or make a difference in the world! Oh, and since there are so many who don’t break the law, make sure your parking and speeding tickets are paid!
July 27th, 2011
To Silent Lamb: S.T.F.U. If i find it on the internet, I download it.
July 30th, 2011
Thank you very much for very informative and interesting movie collection.
July 30th, 2011
Thank you very much for the informative and meaningful movies. I loved the movies and easy to access.
August 3rd, 2011
good
August 10th, 2011
Glad to know this place is full of idiots just like anywhere else.
August 11th, 2011
Greate!
August 16th, 2011
Who cares if these old movies are still under copyright? The stars are dead. The filmmakers are dead. The financiers are dead. Everyone is dead. Anyone/any company of today who profits off owning a copyright in a film like that, whose copyright they simply inherited without working or paying anything, is a thief much more so than we are.
But yea, intellectual property is a pretty tricky, morally gray area at the best of times. When the artists involved are all dead, it’s really morally indefensible. The art is free.
August 17th, 2011
With quality information like this, I bet your website can become a masterpiece among your fellow competitors’ websites. I truly think that bookmarking your site won’t be a waste of time. Please, do keep updating interesting posts!
August 22nd, 2011
Just watched Rescue from Gilligan’s Island. Haha, I had no idea that they were able to get off the island! Great movie, and great list, thanks.
September 6th, 2011
Where are the Great Movies Like Wallage Berry Sr, Grand Hotel and Viva Villa?
September 25th, 2011
The “it’s all copyrighted” posts above show a lack of knowledge about copyright laws, and fail to recognize copyright laws have been changed in recent years in ways that don’t reach back for all films.
Back in the day, before the large media companies lobbied governments worldwide for extremely long copyright terms, copyright was neither automatic nor virtually forever. In the US, works were not automatically copyrighted, and even when they were copyrighted the copyright had to be renewed or it lapsed. This made sense because in a pre-digital world there was little to no value in ephemeral works, and there is a cultural benefit to letting materials enter the public domain. In a digital world, it all changed, and the media companies successfully lobbied for a change in the laws that made copyright automatic and that greatly extended the term of copyright. This change in the law did not reach back and sweep in materials for which the copyright had expired, which includes items where copyright was never properly obtained or where the copyright was allowed to lapse. A statement like “everything since 1923 is copyrighted” just reveals ignorance; a truer statement would be “nothing before” the operative date is copyrighted, and for everything after that date a case by case examination is required. It’s not always easy to tell if old materials are copyrighted, an issue that is bedeviling Google’s attempt to digitize everything in a way that, more or less, complies with copyright. Even determining if there is a copyright and finding the current copyright holder is a very expensive process, and as a result the shadow of today’s punitive copyright laws keep many public domain works out of circulation because it is too hard to prove that they are really public domain. There is a cost to this – reflected here – because these very broad laws that benefit none of the original creators keep out of circulation works of art that are part of our common heritage.
October 1st, 2011
Digg this! Thanks for the valid, legal links. Sure could watch some of these films here, some look interesting. Even the Phantom links here.
Wholesale Beads
http://www.beadnshop.com
October 16th, 2011
The problem with the copyright discussions here is that it doesn’t cover the whole story regarding movie copyrights. A film’s copyright applies only to the rights of reproduction of the film itself. However, within the film are elements which are covered under separate copyrights, most notably music. While the rights to copy and distribute a movie may have fallen into public domain, the elements within the movie, i.e., music, popular songs, the script itself, the material on which the script is based, even costume designs, could still be under their own separate copyrights. Internet Archive states this very thing on their website. That said, while the distribution and exhibition rights to the film of “The Boy in the Plastic Bubble” may be in the public domain, the musical score most certainly is not, as it would have it’s own copyright via the composer and/or the music publisher. Exhibiting this movie, or distributing it in any form would violate the rights of the music’s copyright holders, not to mention any other separate rights, such as the the rights of the celebrity images in the movie (John Travolta, Robert Reed’s Estate, etc.) So, it’s a misnomer to make a blanket statement that a movie is in the public domain. Specifically, a the rights to a movie’s exhibition or distribution are in the public domain, but other rights (music, celebrity likeness, etc.) are mostly likely still retained by the composer, the actor, or their estate. I’ve asked IA about this repeatedly, and they finally placed the disclaimer on their site that movies in the PD are not necessarily “rights free.”
October 16th, 2011
PART TWO: An example of copyright violation on Internet Archive are the Tarzan movies, and any audio books based on original Tarzan books. Why? Aren’t the movies and books now in the public domain? Yes, they are. But guess what isn’t? The CHARACTER of Tarzan himself. The name Tarzan is still a live trademark owned by the estate of Edgar Rice Burroughs. Did Disney have to pay for the right to use the name when producing it’s Saturday morning Tarzan cartoons? You betcha. Even though they could have used the text from the books verbatim for the story, any use of the name “Tarzan” without permission from the estate of the author, would have violate their trademark of the name, and placed Disney at risk to be sued. (A case they would have lost.) Check out the Disney Tarzan cartoons… they carry a trademark notice regarding the name of Tarzan, with used by permission of the estate of Edgar Rice Burroughs. Whether Disney paid the estate or not (what do YOU think?) they still had to gain permission. This type of scenario is played out time and time again on IA, and I’m surprised they haven’t been shut down.
October 16th, 2011
PART THREE: Another example of misunderstanding public domain status on Internet Archive, are the Betty Boop cartoons. While the RIGHTS to distribute the film have fallen into the public domain, the character of Betty Boop is copyrighted and owned by Fleischer Studios, Inc. (still a viable California corporation) and Hearst Holdings. The US Trademark Office shows the name Betty Boop as a LIVE trademark. Additionally, for example, one of the Betty Boop cartoons contains musical performances by Cab Calloway. The songs he sings in those cartoons are still under copyright by the music publisher. So, any exhibition or distribution of any Betty Boop cartoon would be violating the trademark of the Betty Boop name, and in the Cab Calloway instance, the music copyrights still in effect. So, could you distribute the Betty Boop cartoons commercially for profit without paying the original producers, directors, animators, etc.? Yes, because THOSE rights have fallen into the public domain because they are tied to the production of the FILM; however, you would need to strike a deal with the owners of the trademark of the Betty Boop name, and the copyright holders of any music appearing in those films.
October 22nd, 2011
I deal with the lawyers from Hollywood invading our halls of justice in a very simple way. It’s called social disobedience. When I find a good movie I make many many copies and give them away on DVD. I tell the people that I give them to to do the same. There is no digital trail and I accomplish my purpose. What is my purpose you ask. It’s to take bake the freedom this country was founded on. Why is a patent only good for 20 years but copyright good for 100? Because the lawyers from Hollywood has subverted our legal system. Fight back. Don’t be a mindless drone and say Oh it’s the law I have to do that regardless whether it’s right or not.
October 23rd, 2011
I know it may not be public property or what it is called actually. It is a little too early for brain to get specifics correct, but anyway… One movie i think should be on your list is ” 12 ANGRY MEN”. It is a great movie with Henry Fonda and some more great actors that i can’t remember but there are some very good ones.
November 7th, 2011
Silent Lamb Is an IDIOT! What is your problem, you MUST be a TEA PARTY MEMBER. GOD, what a piece of work!!
November 21st, 2011
Fucking thieves don’t seem to grasp that stealing other peoples’ work will result in those people ceasing to produce.
December 8th, 2011
I love it.Excellent article.I am definitely going to put this into use one of these days.
I will be sure to let you know if I do.Great work!
December 13th, 2011
I appreciate all the debate of copyright and trademark because I’m hoping to use movie clips in a public manner that could lead to at least minimal profit. The last thing I want is to make the wrong decision and jeopardize my enterprise. My search on the very subject sent me here. Thank you to everyone who does care about copyrighting.
December 14th, 2011
Sit back and watch full movie films totally free
December 14th, 2011
heres a dumb idea… lets kill holly wood… no im pretty serious.. .lets be honost, we need to destroy holly wood and start from scratch with fresh people and no business people, we can have a federatio nstyle hollywood where people actualy care about everyone, poor and those who have proven themselves in tests
or atleast we could go full out and create a revolutionary new industry of film writers working with people that want to act, im not saying i hate the actors in hollywood reguardless of thier beliefs, its just a simple truth holly wood holds alota power in our culture and its the nexus of media, which makes it a danger in alot of ways, it can be a force of good, or of obnoxiousness :/
lets at the very least craft a new law system, people get loans from banks for low costs that are insured off thier films, if hte films do good they pay off the loans if they do bad government splits the cost with the bank, if the people geting the loan and their script writer have provenly been bad investments limit thier credit for thier next film, and have a new system wihtout that hastle, create a new hollywood, cleansed of law issues, ownership issues, banks get money from the government caus we have a ridiculous system, lets actualy spread the wealth from the government cheaply to the banks and again cheaply and safely to the people that need it to provide worthwhile enrichment and expression to everyone.
just eliminate all the crap that everyones always argueing about, i mean it would cripple the government at first caus hollywood is like americas last real export besides drugs, which is why thier tolerated and invested in so heavily, and i dont mind that we dont have the industry we used to hopefuly were building it up but capitalism isnt flawless we need to go to socialism, not communist socialism, but true democracy in action socialism, where we vote for hwo the money system works
December 14th, 2011
i’ve curated a variety of films at my website. hover over the CTV link in the menu.
December 16th, 2011
This is all very intelligent – I think. What happened to the existentialist in the conversation? He didn’t say anything, therefore he never existed. ha.ha.ha. Whatever happened to art for art. Be free, the future holds more individual expression than anyone could ever take in…enjoy the past, while it lasts.
December 17th, 2011
Copy right in it self is theft! After all in what aspect of life and society does one get paid for work produced decades ago?
Copyrights along with unproductive patents should have a life span of at most five years, beyond that is no more then legalized theft no one else would get away is, it is immoral , unethical. end copyright!!
December 21st, 2011
What a good information.i need it for downloading legal movies.thank you for helping me.
keep up good work.
December 22nd, 2011
Its like you learn my mind! You appear to understand so much approximately this, like you wrote the e book in it or something. I think that you just can do with some p.c. to force the message house a little bit, but instead of that, that is excellent blog. An excellent read. I will definitely be back.
December 26th, 2011
I beloved as much as you will receive performed right here. The comic strip is attractive, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an impatience over that you would like be handing over the following. sick surely come more beforehand once more as precisely the same nearly a lot ceaselessly within case you defend this increase.
January 4th, 2012
Thanks a lot for sharing this with all folks you really know what you’re speaking about! Bookmarked. Please additionally discuss with my website =). We may have a link trade arrangement between us
January 4th, 2012
This was really a cool and interesting article. I really have learned so much and I am looking forward to reading more.
January 7th, 2012
my o my..all these copyright attys out here..and brainiacts by the composition of your reply’s..lots of opinions out here but you know what they say about opinions…there like ——–.. everybody has one.
January 8th, 2012
Impressive blog with good writing.I think is also a need to share with everyone. Hope to be helpful to you
January 9th, 2012
Hello There. I discovered your weblog using msn. This is an extremely smartly written article. I will be sure to bookmark it and return to learn more of your helpful information. Thanks for the post. I?ll definitely return.
January 11th, 2012
Hello, Neat post. There’s a problem along with your web site in web explorer, may check this? IE still is the market leader and a big element of folks will omit your great writing due to this problem.
January 11th, 2012
It is the best time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I have read this post and if I could I wish to suggest you few interesting things or advice. Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article. I wish to read even more things about it!
January 13th, 2012
I remember when old black and white movies were $2 for 3-nights at Major Video.
We got a VCR for Christmas and drove to the store before lunch. The line was long but everyone wanted movies for their new machine.
We rented about 5 black and white Horror Films and stayed up all night!
A couple of the were in this list. Wow does this bring back memories
January 13th, 2012
I must have at least 5 of these on my DVR. I bought a dedicated DVR instead of a tivo. It has a lot more storage for a movie nut like me.
January 16th, 2012
I’ll sell these movies for a buck a piece and let everyone know if I get sued.Word to da wise, make a buck where and when you can, if you are already poor, they can’t take anything from you.
January 17th, 2012
pleas can i use shoot from film The 39 Steps: A 1935 film directed by Alfred Hitchcock. It is loosely based on the novel The Thirty-nine Steps by John Buchan.
pleas Is it possible to give my the consent on the use of film
January 20th, 2012
The Ace Of Spades by MotorHead
Real Estate IDX
January 21st, 2012
SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_SPAM!!!_!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!YO
January 21st, 2012
—> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> —> GAME OVER!!!
January 21st, 2012
January 22nd, 2012
Haha, I love reading all these crazy excuses for stealing movies. “Actors are dead”, “people break laws all the time”. Independant film-makers are being killed by pirates like you guys. That’s why small-time gems like Halloween or Eraserhead and rarities in modern times. You steal all the movies you want and then complain about how crap movies these days are. You people have no-one to blame but yourself.
@ME: No, but they can throw you in jail.
January 22nd, 2012
some artists now release under Creative Commons.
See “Sita Sings the Blues.”
Independent Animation made for public usage. I do suggest a donation to her if you like her flick ;)
Down with Copywrong, support the artists, not some CEOs and executive douchebags who STEAL from the artists (see the whole history of the music industry for details).
January 25th, 2012
Wonderful blog you have here but I was wanting to know if you knew of any message boards that cover the same topics talked about in this article? I’d really love to be a part of group where I can get opinions from other experienced people that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Bless you!
January 26th, 2012
Don’t you love the Movie Industry trolls on here? They can’t stand it that 1 person may see a 80 year old movie on here without them getting a nickel or dime from it.
Copyright should be 10-15 years max, not eternity!
January 26th, 2012
IF YOU RECORD IT. IT IS FREE. WAKE THE FUCK UP YOU OLD OBSOLETE MINDED FAGGOTS. IT ISNT STEALING, ITS COPYING. DIGITAL COPIES ARE WORTHLESS. THIS IS ART, FOR EVERYONE. IF YOU RECORD IT, IT IS OURS. IT IS FREE. GO GET YOUR MONEY SOME OTHER WAY. YOUR BULLSHIT GREED IS OBSOLETE IN AN AGE WHERE THE WAY YOU WANT TO MAKE YOUR MONEY, IS ABLE TO BE DONE BY A 6 YEAR OLD AT HOME. DONT BE MAD BECAUSE YOU CANT SIT ON YOUR FAT FUCKING ASS AND COLLECT MILLIONS ANYMORE. NOW YOU KNOW WHAT GREED IS BITCH. WAKE UP. NO WAY OF LIFE IS PERMANENT. THE YOUTH OF THE WORLD DEMAND ALL OF THE MEDIA, ALL THE TIME, FOR FREE, AND WE WILL GET IT.
January 30th, 2012
Is there a chance to get some subtitles in english, spanish or french?
February 9th, 2012
Dont tell this to fahad he makes music from the dulcian, bassong and sordun all day long to amuse his girlfriend jane and she likes where it hits you , if you break the law the law comes after you and breaks you sooner or later. dont be an idiot some movies are in public domain and others are not.
February 10th, 2012
@ Silent Lamb
Copyright IS different everywhere, and in the cases of the copyright notice being left off of the U.S. film print, that means PD in the states, but other countries may have had the copyright notice on the film, and not had that mistake. You as the consumer are liable if you illegally download the content.
Example: Project Gutenberg Australia has many books that are PD there, but under copyright in the US. You can download them, but outside in the US, it’s a violation of copyright law.
@ Paul
You would care if you were in control of an estate that would see profits from the copyrights being violated.
@ Truth
Please Keep a civil tongue in your head… ranting like that only makes you sound like a child who knows nothing, regardless the truth of your statement.