It opens next week. Will you go see it?
According to advance reviews, it doesn’t suck.
In the city where it will premiere next Tuesday, United 93 is being greetedÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬?or repelled?ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬?almost as if it were itself some kind of terror attack. Is the movie pornography? Exploitation? Too much too soon?
Having seen it once (apparently with what the studio calls “unfinished” effects), I can attest that the film nobody wants to see is worth seeing. At the very least, United 93ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬?as the most literal representation yet of that unimaginable morningÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬?will hopefully ignite a meaningful debate about the ethics and politics of 9-11 commemoration.
The “Voice” reviewer says it is “at once scrupulous and ghoulish, visceral and sober.” Maya Lin is evoked.
At the end of the review is this interesting addendum:
As noted above, this review of United 93 was based on an unfinished print. Since then, Universal has excised the concluding title card, which read, “America’s war on terror had begun.” The final caption now reads: “Dedicated to the memory of all those who lost their lives on September 11, 2001.”