The Hatfield’s & McCoys: Lieberman v. Lamont
I think itÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s time for a little perspective and a reality check. Perhaps the most important midterm election in modern history is little more than three months away and as I watch the Lieberman vs. Lamont race, I have to shake my head at the energy being invested by Democrats to defeat another Democrat. With the latest Jane Hamsher debacle at Huffington Post on Wednesday and covered here and by the Washington Post, IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m left to wonder how the Democratic Party will ever entice enough middle of the road independent and Republican voters to take a chance on a Democratic candidate, much less giving Democrats control of the House or the Senate come November.
Look, I have no problem with a contested primary and I fully support the people of Connecticut in freely choosing the Senator they preferÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦but I donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t get why the bulk of the progressive netroots feels they need to devote the lions share of their time and effort participating in this one raceÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦while at the same time the Democrats have the best possibility to take control of the House and Senate FROM THE REPUBLICANS in years.
IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m not a Lieberman apologist and I feel the manner in which he supported the President on the Iraq war was wrong because he undermined fellow Democrats in the process. Nonetheless, IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m at a loss to see how making the defeat of Lieberman the equivalent of a public caning (in full view of the opposition and those voters who have the potential to switch and vote Democratic this election) is going to achieve the goals of the progressive netroots. Quite frankly, other than proving that they can influence a race within the Democratic PartyÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦and likely doing so at the expense of the Democratic Party come NovemberÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m fully baffled by the rationale and the intensity of this feud.
Now IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ve read the carefully worded and ample pontifications on the Lieberman betrayalsÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦and were I a woman scorned I might even run about his neighborhood putting up posters saying heÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s a liar and a cheatÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦but since IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢m notÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦and neither are the progressive netrootsÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦why the hell are they doing as much? It just doesnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t add up. If we boot JoeÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s booty, and we donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t gain six Senate seats, we still canÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t shut George Bush down, we still canÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t force an immediate troop withdrawal from Iraq, we still canÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t force a moderate Supreme Court appointment, and since most of us donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t live in Connecticut, we canÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t even enjoy whatever pork Lamont might bring home to Connecticut (and that assumes he can bring home some pork that Lieberman couldnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t have brought).
Anyway, IÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢ve long believed that if you look at a situation and the effort being expended isnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t matched by the potential outcome; something else must be at play. Well it all came clear to me today with Dear JaneÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œlook at me, look at meÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚? miscalculation. HereÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s the thing. Quite frankly, my inclination is to conclude that Joe LiebermanÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s petulance, as annoying as it is, is simply being matched tit for tat by equally petulant individuals. This ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œthingÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚? is no less than the HatfieldÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s and McCoyÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s.
Read the rest of the posting at Thought Theater…here: