The Iraq Roundup
Taking a look around the infosphere…we’ve got a lot of people saying a lot of different things about Iraq.
The most surprising comes from Charles Schumer, who says that Iraq will not be the focus of the 2008 elections…
In place of promises for a new tone in Washington or a focus on such issues as climate change and war, he recommends the bread-and-butter politics of cereal prices, discount air fares and tuition tax credits. Those are items he has typically rolled out at the Sunday news conferences that Schumer has made into an institution. They also, until quite recently, drew a measure of scorn from the press and from his congressional colleagues.
My guess…it’ll be health care.
McCain, an Arizona Republican, said he will propose benchmarks for Iraq’s government to meet as part of the new push, and he also will seek to increase congressional oversight of the war. […]
“There is a legitimate concern about the lack of congressional oversight, about sending Gen. [David] Petraeus there saying we don’t approve of his mission,” he said.
He offered no details of his “embryonic” proposal, but he said those steps “might be a way of calming the concerns that many of our colleagues have.”
We shall see…
Nancy Pelosi fires a shot across the bi-partisan bow and reveals that Bush never talked to her about his new Iraq plan, but did reveal why it would work…
In an interview, Pelosi also said she was puzzled by what she considered the president’s minimalist explanation for his confidence in the new surge of 21,500 U.S. troops that he has presented as the crux of a new “way forward” for U.S. forces in Iraq.
“He’s tried this two times ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬? it’s failed twice,” the California Democrat said. “I asked him at the White House, ‘Mr. President, why do you think this time it’s going to work?’ And he said, ‘Because I told them it had to.’ ”
Asked if the president had elaborated, she added that he simply said, ” ‘I told them that they had to.’ That was the end of it. That’s the way it is.”
Could this surge be a faith-based intiative? Only time will tell…
The New York Sun has some good news from Iraq in an article that claims many insurgent groups are running out of steam and only the groups controlled by Al Qaeda are going strong…
The wider Sunni insurgency ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬? the groups beyond Al Qaeda ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬? is being slowly, and surely, defeated. The average insurgent today feels demoralized, disillusioned, and hunted. Those who have not been captured yet are opting for a quieter life outside of Iraq. Al Qaeda continues to grow for the time being as it cannibalizes the other insurgent groups and absorbs their most radical and hardcore fringes into its fold. The Baathists, who had been critical in spurring the initial insurgency, are becoming less and less relevant, and are drifting without a clear purpose following the hanging of their idol, Saddam Hussein. Rounding out this changing landscape is that Al Qaeda itself is getting a serious beating as the Americans improve in intelligence gathering and partner with more reliable Iraqi forces.
In other words, battling the insurgency now essentially means battling Al Qaeda. This is a major accomplishment.
And by the way…that’s a damn good article about the realities on the ground in Iraq. Definitely read the whole thing.
That’s your Iraq roundup. Enjoy.